The latest issue of Fireside Fiction just went live, and with it, my short story, The Middle Child's Practical Guide to Surviving a Fairy Tale, the story I read at last year's World Fantasy Con and this year's ICFA. Originally written as a Twitter joke, it slowly grew into a blog post, as these things do, and then mutated into a short story.

Also just going live, the latest issue of Lightspeed, available for subscribers or as an individual issue, which includes my short story, "Deathlight," along with new short stories by An Owomoyela, Seanan McGuire, and Wole Talabi, reprints from a number of well known names including Tim Pratt and Elizabeth Hand, and Hugh Howey's "The Plagiarist."

I may have a bit more to say about this one once my individual story goes live on the web on May 17, but for now, I'll just note that the two stories are, I think, quite different - and not just because one is more or less fantasy (if a bit snarky about it) and the other marks my return to hard science fiction.

Enjoy!
My latest little story, "The Dollmaker's Rage," up on Daily Science Fiction this morning.
Fantasy Magazine's poll for the best story of 2010 is up again for this year, along with a prize for readers who take the time to comment on any of the stories there.

Usually this is the key for me to shill for my story, but, honestly, Fantasy had a very good year in 2010, and as I said earlier, I'm guessing that "Mademoiselle and the Chevalier" will get buried under all that quality. Which is a decidedly good thing. So in this case, I'm posting this more to alert you to the chance to win an Amazon gift certificate -- and maybe spend part of the upcoming week reveling in the lovely work on the site.

**********

In other news, I had a particularly vicious attack of insomnia last night, and my attempt to try to make up for this by sleeping in was also ruined, which in turn led to me pouring milk into the coffee maker instead of water (it is perhaps best not to ask too much about this) which is not as it turns out the best way to brew coffee. I just thought you should know.

On a related note, when are those Star Trek replicator machines that produce the food you want, and specifically coffee, on demand, arriving in our households? Shouldn't we have those by now?
1. First, I'm leaving for World Fantasy Con tomorrow (Wednesday) and will be back the following Tuesday, adding extra layover time at both ends to let me rest. I deliberately haven't signed up for any panels or readings, just to keep my schedule as flexible and free as possible, but if you're around, feel free to come up and say hi.

2. Internet: In theory they have internet in Columbus Ohio and the wonder that is the Hyatt hotel. In reality I have no idea what my internet access (or free time) will be. Posting may be heavy, light, or non-existent.

3. The real question, however, is not so much internet access at World Fantasy Con as internet access when I return. By the time I return, we will have moved to the house (yay!) and I will be staying there. Brighthouse Networks and the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster willing, we shall have internet access by that point. You may have noticed, however, that I named a little tiny entity called Brighthouse Networks in there, which has the ability to entirely and completely mess this up, so I'm not counting on having internet access by then, or indeed for several days.

4. Because of these two factors, I shall break my long standing tradition and go ahead and announce a publication before it appears. That's right: Fantasy Magazine will be publishing my short story, "Mademoiselle and the Chevalier," a tale of gargoyles, roses and magical rings, on Monday, November 1st. The story is one of my personal favorites, which actually makes me more nervous – I can deal with an unfavorable response to stories I don't care about as much, but I want everyone to love and hug this little tale. It might be just as well if I'm offline when it appears.

And....you'll all excuse me, but apparently I must go comfort a cat.

Dolls

Jul. 12th, 2010 12:52 pm
Today's spectacular website brought to you by [personal profile] d_aulnoy.

My dolls, in theory, were separated into two strict categories: dolls I played with, which consisted of four dolls plus a Raggedy Ann: a doll in rather battered condition, called Big Dolly; a doll that I loved because she had a little pink sleeping bag all of her own, named Tina; a doll with a gorgeous – to me – yellow dress that, after pressure, I named Amy; and, much later, a doll large enough to walk with if you moved her arm properly, a trick I never exactly mastered.

They were the dolls I played with, as distinct from the three dolls I got when I was six, which were looking-at dolls, dolls that went on a shelf, not to be touched for anything except for dusting.

Naturally, the distinction was a little less clear in my mind. After all, Amy couldn't be played much with, since it might spoil her dress and her good looks, and she was very very careful about that. (Come to think of it, maybe I got her name from Little Women, although I actually read that book for the first time well after Amy entered my life, and I don't recall seeing a movie version until later.) And by that time, Big Dolly was a little too battered to be played with (this happens when Big Dollies are thrown across the room.)

And nothing quite stopped me from "playing with" the three looking-at dolls.

They had come from Scandinavia, cheap tourist souvenirs that Uncle E, a friend of my father's, had picked up someplace or another (knowing E, possibly Scandinavia, but knowing E, quite possibly not.) They were dressed in "traditional" costumes, with little golden tags at the bottom giving their origin – and, more critically for me, their names.

Finlandia had the nicest, widest dress, and the sweetest expression: she was therefore kinda looked down upon by her two sisters – they were clearly sisters – Swerge, who was inclined to be quiet, and Norge, who had a rather severe expression and was inclined to be critical. With these three, I did fairly well until we moved to Italy – and travelled to Florence. Once there, we picked up Firenze, who was by far the cheapest of the cheap dolls (and remained in that category for awhile); she couldn't stand up properly, and Norge was inclined to be, well, actually nasty about it, and I'm afraid that even kindly Finlandia was often dismissive. (I could be cruel and torturous.)

As we travelled throughout Italy and Europe, I picked up more dolls, gradually adding them to the collection – and the story. Slavia (for Yugoslavia, back in the days when Yugoslavia was still around) became the queen, not for historical or economic or political accuracy, but because she had a headpiece that looked vaguely crown-like (not really) and a very firm expression. Hollandia was much younger than everyone else and had a serious problem keeping her shoes on, constantly losing them before court appearances. (At that she did considerably better than poor Firenze who kept falling over and was, I must admit, a Court Disgrace.) Venezia and her lover Venezi brought in some excitement, since Venezi was the first boy, until his hat broke and he became inclined to hide behind Venezia. A little rubber doll named Buhl had to take the rest of the masculine burden for years. Paris, who was quite aristocratic, despite her size, sniffed at everyone and soon became a major rival of Norge, and Espana, who had a fabulous flamenco dress, was Real Nobility from a Rival Line to the Throne, and, besides, Had a Past.

Buying dolls proved problematic: I had to find dolls that would talk to me, and had the right expressions needed for the story, which may sound simple, but is less so when you are looking at a line of very cheap dolls with unsympathetic adults who want to look at other things. Sicilia turned out to be heartbreaking: she was simply the wrong doll (although, actually the first of the actually interesting dolls in my collection – she was woven of colorful straw and was, from aesthetic considerations, a major step up from the cheap plastic dolls) and she could not, would not, participate in the story, only waiting on the edges with a permanent expression of incomprehension. My Russian nesting dolls – clearly a family all of their own, never really entered the story either, although they had one of their own, and every once in a while would enjoy a court visit. They never felt quite comfortable there, though, and eventually I moved them to their own shelf and story, which went nowhere and got dropped. (Hmm. Another relationship with some of my current fiction.)

As the collection grew, however, my parents began taking it more seriously, and the epic – and the characters – became enhanced with slightly to considerably better dolls (although Aloha, who triumphantly refused to follow any court dictates whatsoever and managed to bring Paris and Norge into a temporary if fierce agreement, rather retreated to the cheap plastic model, as did Cherokee). This only enhanced the rivalries: the older dolls (particularly poor Firenze and San Marina, who by now really weren't looking too good) were fiercely jealous of the wealthy Korea's swing and the lovely accessories of the Japanese dolls. Poisonings became rampant, as did knifings, although China One turned out to have some unexpected resources.

They are all in storage now, the later, more beautiful dolls, and the cheap plastic ones that began the epic, their stories brought to a temporary, perhaps permanent, halt. I don't miss them the way I do some of my other things in storage (books! fondue pot! kronos quartet CDs that yes, yes, I should have copied onto the hard drive instead of packing away! But I digress). They had, after all, been resting in boxes for some time. And even before that, their epic tales had been fading, little by little. Many of the later, more beautiful dolls were not ones I chose, not ones who promised, while stuffed amongst cheap tourist trap items, to talk to me and become members of the doll court, and so their voices were quieter, and in turn, that brought some silence to the doll court.

But at some point, I mean to unpack them, and place the particularly beautiful dolls in a display with space to add a few more, and place the other dolls – the dolls of the original tales – someplace where I can imagine their court adventures continuing, in the shadows.

(Which is all a long, long, way of saying, er, thanks [personal profile] d_aulnoy for adding yet more items to my I Want list. And, um, explaining my sniffling during Toy Story 3.)
So, as part of this (so far, mostly failed) attempt to blog daily in July, a tale from last weekend.

I headed over to my mother's for a small July 4th party. So you know, my mother has a condo that overlooks a small lake and just beyond that, Universal Studios/Islands of Adventure on one side. From another balcony, you can see SeaWorld's occasional fireworks, and if you don't mind heading into the hallway, you can more or less see Disney's fireworks in the distance. That, combined with various small private celebrations (Florida: we can and will use gunpowder at will! YAY!) makes it a pretty decent place to watch fireworks, even if this year, the larger celebrations (the various city/town/neighborhood/resort fireworks) were split up between two nights.

Joining us were some friends and acquaintances from my mother's church – A and B (not their real initials), the acquaintances, and C and MF (their real initials; I think a few of you have actually met them), the actual friends. A was a quiet, older, uncertain man, eager to please; B, his wife, held herself carefully, tightly, and watched everyone. C and I bonded again over a mutual hatred for Alamo Rent-A-Car and Continental Airlines and Delta Airlines while A listened and nodded, and in another area my mother caught up on church news with B and MF.

Over dinner my mother, who really liked my story in Shine: An Anthology of Optimistic Science Fiction and wants me to write more things like that, instead of "that weird stuff," brought up, proudly, the subject of my writing and "all of her great reviews," and I clarified that yes, I write science fiction and – and this is important – fantasy. Fantasy. Fantasy. We're all clear on what this means to most people, right?

Magic.

Since the group did not exactly consist of science fiction/fantasy fans (it's safe to say I was the only one in the group) conversation meandered over to disability issues. My mother noted that when you're chronically ill, you tend to want to spend your good moments enjoying life, not focused on disabled advocacy. Nonetheless, the group agreed that I am nice and articulate and should spend my time doing disabled advocacy, even if I want to write about, say, magic instead.

Fortunately enough things started to explode outside, so to the balconies we headed.

I mentioned that you can see Universal Studios from the condo, right? This unfortunately means that you can also see Universal's Rip Ride Rockit, which from a distance at night looks like a little dragon – or, on July 4th, a little firework - climbing, climbing into the sky and then PLUNGING at a very nasty angle to its dragon death. (Ironically, the cars on Universal's Dragon Challenge ride, from a distance, don't resemble dragons at all.) It's kinda sickening, although I am assured by no less an expert than a ten year old that "Oh that ride is TOTALLY AWESOME BUT YOU HAVE TO RIDE IT AT LEAST FOUR TIMES BEFORE YOU THROW UP." So, um, now you know. You will not be getting my personal testimony on this subject.

But anyway. You can also see Hogwarts rising from the end of the park – and, as it turns out, blocking the main place where Universal Studios used to set off their fireworks, with the result that Universal gave us only a Small and Sad fireworks show, but whatever. This led to a discussion about various trips by grandchildren (I should have mentioned that I was by far the youngest person there) who were all Very Excited about Universal Studios. MF, who, as I may have mentioned, is a very nice woman who deserves better than to be tortured by thrill rides, made a few jokes about it; C revealed that he doesn't actually know the difference between Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter (he'd seen bits of the movies but gotten bored, and never read any of the books). My mother and C complained about the rumors of lines (reportedly still two to four hours, which in Florida summer heat is no joke). I admitted that I loved Harry Potter and was planning on going once the temperatures, at least, got reasonable (I'm not holding out much hope for reasonable lines), and my mother explained that she would be dropping me off, but not bothering to enter herself, and B noted that her grandchildren wanted to see Harry Potter, but that she had read all about witchcraft and wizardry in the Bible, and she knew what the Bible had to say about wizardry and witchcraft.

Pause.

I should note, by the way, that this is not an attitude I tend to associate with the United Methodist Church. (Also, to stave off some potential comments – yes, I'm agnostic; no, I have no problems with churches or Christians.)

Conversation shifted, for awhile, to other things – church gossip, grandchildren gossip, fireworks excitement, general agreement that watching the Rip Ride Rockit and Magical Midway's Slingslot thingy was making everyone sick, and then another mention of Harry Potter, and B admitting that she'd seen the various lines of people heading to or already inside Universal, pretending to be witches.

"Seeing them in their costumes and those wands –" her breath caught a little –"it makes me sick."

Awkward pause.

It took me a few seconds to open my mouth to answer, but MF was there first. "Well, you have to give Harry Potter credit for at least one thing," she said. "It's got kids actually reading real books. That's something."

"That's true," said C hastily.

But I, the fantasy writer, said nothing. Perhaps I should have, but then again, I'd already noted that I was planning on handing over hard earned money to Universal Studios for the sake of Harry Potter, that I liked Harry Potter, and, more critically, that I actually write the sort of things she finds so evil and sickening. Perhaps, I thought, in her focus on the evil of wizards and witchcraft, she missed that the word "fantasy" encompasses both. And I did not want to start an argument in my mother's home with one of her guests - especially since arguing would not have done any good.

Before she left, B told me, again, that I really should become a disabled advocate. The phrase "God's plan" might have been mentioned.

I don't have a neat summary sentence to end this post. It's just a report, really.
Well, this is a genuine shock.

Playing With Spades apparently just made the British Fantasy Awards 2010 Longlist.

Much thanks to [personal profile] csecooney for pointing this out to me - this award is usually completely off my radar, so I wasn't paying much attention to the list - and in my defense, it looks as if [personal profile] oldcharliebrown, who is better at keeping track of such things, missed it as well. Maybe I wasn't on the original Longlist?

In any case, much, much thanks to whoever nominated me, and congratulations to others on the list: [personal profile] wirewalking, [personal profile] aliettedb, [personal profile] truepenny and the many, many others who I am sure I am missing. (Just remember, I also missed me.) And congratulations to Fantasy Magazine for publishing so many nominated stories.
When I was a kid, I desperately wanted to go to Oz.

Sure, I already lived in upstate New York, in a yard with an enchanted rose garden where shadows could talk to you, if you caught them right at the right moment; Indiana, near a park with magical trees, and in Italy, a place of its own strange magic, where I had a rock playground to conquer and later a small "hidden" area to sneak into and rule. (It wasn't that well hidden.) But I still wanted to visit Oz. After all, in Oz, animals could talk, meals literally grew on trees as complete three course meals (and apparently waste disposal was never a problem); candy grew in great profusion; and girls could wander off into adventures whenever they wished.

And Narnia, again with the talking animals. (I think part of this want was just to talk to talking animals. I admit, after years of living with cats, I am a little less inclined to hear them vocalize their thoughts since I fear this will deteriorate into endless complaints about how their food bowl is not exactly filled to the precise amount needed with the food they most desire, that, and endless conversations about the great advantages of napping and sun and being left utterly alone during these critical sun napping times and that they are not getting scratched enough. But I digress.)

But other places never pulled at me in the same way. I loved the Earthsea books, for instance, and I have always wanted to see a dragon, but the islands themselves felt cold, not places I ever wanted to live. I felt the same way about Pern, even with its fire lizards (I never really wanted to ride any of McCaffery's dragons, though I'd love to have a little fire lizard. Think about how much fun it could have with the cats. And vice versa.). But for whatever reason – perhaps knowing that at certain moments your mind could be overtaken by the mating needs of alien dragons – I never exactly wanted to go there.

Or I found myself only wanting to visit parts of imaginary worlds. I had a faint curiosity about the Shire (though I liked the sound of the food), and none at all about Gondor (which seems to have wretched food), but I most certainly would want to take a boat to the uttermost west and wander in Tol Eressea and Valinor (which has magical food). I would not want to visit most of George RR Martin's Westeros – mostly because I assume I'd lose a couple of feet and hands on the trip – but I would love to spend a day or two resting in the Water Gardens. And, ok, it would be awesome to see the Wall and the Eyrie. Not that I'd want to live in either place.

(In thinking it over it does seem as if my desire to visit imaginary places strongly correlates with the quality of the food there. Or at least the descriptions of the food. Hmm.)

I'm not sure how a writer can build that desire – I'm not sure it's even always a good thing to have in a book. The Oz books, much though I love most of them, are not exactly up to the same literary quality as Le Guin, for instance. And I happily reread books set in places I would never want to see. But that doesn't keep my mind from wandering in the imaginary worlds I'd love to travel in.

Sigh

Aug. 4th, 2009 06:20 pm
But I find myself impelled to chat about the table of contents for The Mammoth Book of Mindblowing SF. As many others have pointed out, this supposedly mindblowing book does not have one story in it by a woman, or a person of color. Or Isaac Asimov. ([profile] tchernabyelo has an excellent post suggesting that the Table of Contents even does a disservice to white male writers.)

I was going to stay silent on this, really, I was. I suck at these sorts of conversations. And then I remembered three more conversations/blog posts I've been in/read about just this week that chatted about the perception that men read/write science fiction and women read/write fantasy. Never mind that a couple of the major bestselling fantasy writers out there have been men (Tolkien, Robert Jordan, George RR Martin, Ted Williams.) (Or, amusingly enough, that it was two guys who told me to read Twilight. I'm still working on forgiving them for this.) Never mind that some of the major bestselling and ground breaking science fiction writers have been women (Ursula LeGuin, Octavia Butler, Joanna Russ, Nancy Kress, far more) Never mind that the boundary between the two fields is extremely questionable to begin with and many works of speculative fiction contain elements of both, and many writers write in both fields.

No, what's upsetting me is the robots.

When I was a kid, I had no taste in books whatsoever. None. For crying out loud, I read Enid Blyton and Bobbsey Twin books. Yes, it was that bad. My horrified parents and grandfather tried to help by sneaking in decent books, some of which I did like/love. Two things, though, could automatically make any book ABSOLUTELY GREAT:

Robots.
Dinosaurs.

(Alas, no one ever wrote the ultimate book for me: a book where all the dinosaurs were secretly robots and trampled all over schools and found pirate treasure and kidnapped criminals. I did tell you I had no taste as a kid, right? Moving on.)

I loved robot books. Good, bad, indifferent – it really didn't matter; if it had a robot in it, I read it. I also watched Star Trek and played Star Wars with all of my friends, all of whom wanted to be Han Solo because, let's face it, Han had an ACTUAL spaceship and in the last two movies redeemed himself by also having robots.

Fantasy, at the time, was a decidedly secondary love. Yes, I loved Oz and Narnia and the Nesbitt books. But I wanted robots. And come to think of it, Oz actually had a robot (Tik-tok, the mechanical man who needs to be wound up). No wonder I loved Oz. Talking animals AND ROBOTS. But I digress.

In case it hasn't been clear, I'm a girl.

And each and every time someone says something like this:

" That probably has something to do with my concept of "mind-blowing". Women are every bit as capable of writing mindblowing sf as men are, but with women the stories concentrate far more on people, life, society and not the hard-scientific concepts I was looking for."

I want to respond with, "BUT, ROBOTS!"

I mean, I could dispute this by chatting about Connie Willis and Ursula LeGuin and Nancy Kress, or about how the phrase mindblowing sf does not necessarily have to exclude a focus on people, life and society, or how much of the very best science fiction focuses on how hard scientific concepts change people, life and society (and robots!). I could note that this just again perpetuates the ingrained and frustrating fallacy that not only sees science fiction and fantasy as two opposing genres (even though they're continually shelved together in bookstores and libraries), so ingrained that even someone like this particular anthologist/editor, who has focused on and published female writers before, finds himself repeating it.

Instead, I'll just say it again:

I love robots. Really, really, love robots.

Even the ones that don't look like dinosaurs.
Flashback. September. I've just come in from a day at the Mayo Clinic, which is less fun than it sounds, resting in a one of those blah, forgettable hotels, watching House reruns on the USA Network, wiped. My mind flashes back - a flashback within a flashback - to a few years earlier, playing card games, pinochle, with a few friends.

This story grew out of that evening. It's dedicated to [profile] coldecho and [profile] athenakt, in memory of several nights playing pinochle.

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags