[personal profile] mariness
Entertainment Weekly reports that Hulu.com will start charging for content in 2010.

As a long term strategy for Hulu.com, I think this is a mistake. Largely because Hulu.com is not offering any unique content: everything is shows is either already available on regular broadcast TV (unless you are this household which hasn't gotten around to installing the little digital switcher thing so that we can see the two networks that broadcast here), cable TV (admittedly paid, but with a considerably greater selection of realtime content in better, often HD quality, although also admittedly with way too many ads, which drive me so nuts that we aren't bothering to get cable), network sites (same quality, same amount of ads, still free), iTunes (paid but better quality), Netflix, or DVDs. The only thing Hulu.com really offered was an aggregate service that meant not needing to click around to various sites. And I don't think that charging for content will do much to increase their site visitors.

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags