Richard III

Feb. 4th, 2013 08:54 am
Years back I was an unofficial member of a group whose research zeal focused on some of the most important issues of the day. I am talking, of course, about the various Richard III societies, dedicated to restoring the reputation of the 500 year old monarch and possible nephew-killer which we can all agree is the sort of important subject that can keep you awake over coffee. Or not.

I am not inclined to agree completely with all Richard III defenders -- for instance, I find it somewhat more likely that the disappearance of the two little nephews in the tower was thanks to the mechanizations of the Duke of Norfolk, not Henry VII. Or elves. Anyway, this is all a long meandering way of saying that the skeleton of Richard III was found beneath a Leicester car park. Naturally, Richard is tweeting about the discovery of his corpse.
Some years back I happened to be in St. Augustine and decided to go on the St. Augustine historical reenactment tour. It was awful, but this post is not about that. Rather, it's about the woman who was doing the candlemaking demonstration, who told me that before the 19th century, no women could read.

"At least three of Henry VIII's wives were very literate," I noted. "His first wife, Catherine of Aragon, could speak several languages, was trained in classical humanism, and worked as her father's ambassador for a time writing diplomatic letters. Anne Boleyn read widely and could write. Catherine Parr was a popular, published writer of religious works. And this was all before St. Augustine was founded."

"I never knew that."

So I told her a little more about women writers in the 16th, 17th and 18th century, the French salon fairy tale writers (primarily if not entirely women), the educated Spanish mystics and so on.

"I didn't even think women wrote until this century," she said. "Well, except for Louisa May Alcott. And Jane Austen."

************

In which I blather on at some length about the Louvre, medieval history, Assyrian art, Roswitha, cultural assumptions and even mention Batman. For those staring in stark horror, no, I don't know what's brought on this onslaught of uncharacteristically lengthy and academic posts but I suspect that fluff and snark shall be returning soon. )
From The New York Review of Books: a fascinating discussion of the blurred lines between archaeology, restoration, faking and Vogue.

The "revelation" that we see in the past what we wish to see, shaped by contemporary cultures, is hardly new, but it's fascinating to see how forgery slides into our reconstructions of ancient pasts.

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags