Friday J.S. and I headed over to Winter Park to see the Morse Museum.

It was the second time I'd been there, and I have to say, I liked it even more the second time. The Morse Museum features the work of Louis Comfort Tiffany, which mostly means stained glass, along with some pieces from other artists more or less associated with the late 19th and early 20th century, and two doors from medieval India which are just kinda there but also kinda cool. It's smallish – the entire museum can easily be seen in a couple of hours, maybe a little more or a little less depending on whether or not you decide to watch the introductory videos and how long you spend watching the light flood through the stained glass.

Alas, some of this glass, for preservation purposes, is displayed with a steady electric light that shows the glowing colors of the glass, and not the interplay of changing light with the glass. And, I'll be honest, I don't like a lot of Tiffany stuff – specifically, I'm not a big fan of most of the Tiffany lamps. I love dragonflies when they are flying around outside and sparkling under the sun, but I'm considerably less fond of dragonflies hovering over me when I'm trying to read. It bugs me.

Er, sorry.

Despite the smallness of the museum, we did have to interrupt the tour for emergency sandwiches and chocolate. I think you can all understand. Especially since the supposed motto of the museum is that beauty is an essential part of life, something we must all create and enjoy, and well, I may not have created the chocolate fudge cookie with white chocolate icing and I may not have allowed anyone to contemplate its beauty for very long, but I did enjoy it. That's the important part. Then we headed back for more light and glass, and the part of the museum designed to let light shift and dance through glass, an excellent way to follow up the magic of chocolate.

One other thing we both noticed: the museum is understandably set up for adults. I say understandably because we were the youngest people there by far, though I suspect the museum gets school groups at other times of the year. (Especially since it's across the street from a private school.) It has very few of the velvet ropes that generally separate visitors from art, although a few areas are set up to beep at you if you point at objects and while pointing happen to put your hand over an invisible line. Anyway. This means that the lighting and displays for the smaller pieces are set up on the assumption that they will be viewed only from above.

Which means if, like me, you're in a wheelchair, you get a very different view of many objects – in some cases seeing light bulbs otherwise not meant to be seen, in some cases not getting to see inside some of the glass and ceramic bowls, which in a few cases meant not seeing a different shimmer of colors. In other cases, this meant seeing small details – including different shimmering colors – not visible from above. J had me stand a few times, carefully enough, and I had her kneel sometimes, equally carefully. Sometimes the angle really does change things, especially when looking at magic and light.
I first saw glassblowers in Venice.

In my memories, it's also the first time I saw magic.

The men put sticks into hot fire, drawing out something that was red and gleaming and – it seemed – liquid fire. And then, from that, they would start to pull at the fire, twisting, pulling. Other colors would emerge and then – this was the magic – a little horse would come out. Or a flower. Or a shoe. Or a vase. Once the glassblowers snipped off little pieces of purple glass, all glittering, and gave one piece to my brother and another piece to me. I still have mine. And I still have the horse I was allowed to get – green, since green was my favorite color that day (it changes, but is never orange). Only one horse, not more, because my parents were afraid that I would break the others, a prophecy that alas proved all too true: that horse is in my room right now, in the shelves across from me, with one foot missing, to remind me of magic. And breaking things.

It's not really a surprise, I guess, that I fell in love with glass blowing and glass art and can spend hours sitting in front of glassworkers and that even hours spent in front of stained glass cathedral windows listening to extraordinarily dull and frequently factually incorrect lectures on tympanums couldn't quite destroy this love (although it made me considerably less fond of Romanesque architecture, but that's another saga.) I want to do that, I found myself thinking.

I remembered, too, the little "stained glass" kits I had when I was a kid – when you had a metal frame, and you dropped little colored balls in it, and put it into the oven, and, yay! Stained glass. Of a sort. That had been fun and worth doing again, even if not precisely a high level of creativity.

So, when our town catalog flopped into our mailbox, coincidentally while I was trying to think of ways to get myself out of the house and doing something new and meeting more people, offering a glass art class, I had to sign up. I didn't quite tingle with excitement, but my mind thought of all of the happy things I could do with glass. The term, I realized, was rather vague. Would we be making stained glass? Glass jewelry? Glass art pieces? Or – realizing how unlikely this was for an introductory glass art glass in a community center in a small city that has not exactly shed a small town feel – would we actually be doing glass blowing?

As always, reality rather rudely intruded into these lovely ideas. Along, of course, with hurricanes. Potential ones, that is.

Cut for fakery, adhesive, length and green dolphins. Sorry about the dolphin part. )

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags